Kokoschka painted fast and direct in pure oil, standing, on heavy-weight linen that could take the physical force of his brushwork. Because the painting had to catch the sitter's inner rhythm rather than the surface likeness, he required each sitter to talk and move, and he worked all over the canvas at once so the psychological tone stayed consistent from the first session. He pushed wet paint with his fingers, scratched into the impasto with the butt of the brush, and reserved his finest round soft-haired brushes for the eyes and hands. When a passage went stagnant he scraped it down with a palette knife and rebuilt it in fresh paint at higher chromatic intensity.
Treated the portrait not as a record of appearance but as a transcription of the sitter's psychological "aura." Sitters required to be physically animated — encouraged to talk, argue, move. The posed silence of the academic portrait was exactly what he was destroying.
Why it matters · A held face is a death mask. Most painters pose their sitters; Kokoschka animated them. The discipline is to refuse the still pose as the basis for the painting.
Pushed wet paint with fingers; scratched into impasto with the butt of the brush (sgraffito) — the same technique Rembrandt had used three centuries earlier, put to very different ends.
Why it matters · The finished surface is a record of the physical engagement between the painter and the canvas. Painters who only ever use the bristle end miss what the surface itself can do. The mark in the wet paint reads as a mark in the painting.
Worked "all over" the canvas rather than from part to part — the psychological tone had to be consistent across the whole surface from the first session.
Why it matters · The opposite of Vermeer's passage-by-passage discipline. Painters who finish parts in isolation produce surfaces of different temperatures. Kokoschka's argument is that psychological coherence is global, not local.
Eyes and hands considered the centers of expression — worked with disproportionately fine round soft-haired brushes. The rest of the face was broader. Background handling was broadest of all.
Why it matters · A portrait's reading depends on the eyes and the hands. Painters who finish every passage to the same standard waste their attention on infrastructure. Kokoschka's discipline of differential finish concentrates energy where the painting actually lives.
When a passage felt "stagnant" — his word — scraped it down with a palette knife and rebuilt it with fresh paint at higher chromatic intensity. Did not glaze over dead passages; removed them.
Why it matters · A glaze over a dead passage stays dead. Same logic as Sargent's scrape-and-restart. Painters who only ever paint forward over their failures produce stratified mistakes.
After the war, founded the Schule des Sehens (School of Seeing) in Salzburg in 1953. Ran the international summer academy each July for more than twenty years. Direct transmission of the method to several generations of European and American painters.
Why it matters · Influence runs through teaching, not through publication alone. The Salzburg syllabus demanded students paint "realistically and loosely" — the specific Kokoschka combination. Painters who do not transmit their practice through students lose the method on their own death.
Major masses of figure and environment laid in simultaneously, all-over rather than part to part.
Why: Psychological tone must be consistent across the whole surface from the first session.
Silhouette refined into the specific body. Eyes and hands placed with fine soft-haired brushes — primary carriers of the sitter's aura.
Why: If the eyes are wrong, the portrait is wrong regardless of the rest.
Environment painted at the same tonal key as the figure, not subordinated.
Why: A Kokoschka sitter inhabits a space as psychologically loaded as they are. The space is not a neutral frame.
Stagnant passages scraped down with a palette knife and rebuilt with fresh paint at higher chromatic intensity.
Why: Glazing over a dead passage stays dead. Removal is faster than correction.
Fingers and brush handle pushed, dragged, scratched into wet paint.
Why: Tactile marks break up smooth passages and add the record of physical engagement to flat areas.
Every teacher and student below sits on the site-wide teacher-student map.
“The hand animates the space around it.”
“Observe closely the age and color of the skin, the way the hand animates the space.”
“Paint realistically in a fairly thick, impasto technique.”
“A portrait must show the living being. It must not describe. It must present.”
Lead white for the highest lights, often thick enough to hold the brush track; a standard earth range; synthetic ultramarine; emerald green in planes of the face; and cadmium reds and oranges as accents of intensity. He placed the ultramarine in the shadows of flesh, not because the shadow was actually blue, but because the blue carried the psychological pressure.
Pure oil on heavy-weight linen canvases with conventional standard oil priming, chosen because the canvas had to tolerate the physical force of his brushwork. He rarely varnished his early paintings; he preferred the matte, slightly absorbent quality of unvarnished oil. For the political-landscape cityscapes of the 1920s and 1930s he also experimented with egg tempera and watercolour.
He used fingers and the butt of the brush as often as the brush itself. He pushed wet paint with his fingers and scratched into the impasto with the brush handle (sgraffito), the same technique Rembrandt had used three centuries earlier. The finished surface reads as a record of the physical engagement between the painter and the canvas.
With large flat hog-bristle brushes he laid in the major masses of figure and environment simultaneously, all over the canvas rather than part to part, because the psychological tone had to be consistent across the whole surface from the first session. Eyes and hands came next, placed with fine round soft-haired brushes as the primary carriers of the sitter's aura. Through it all the sitter was required to talk and move.
He trained at the Vienna Kunstgewerbeschule from 1905 to 1909, the same School of Arts and Crafts where Klimt had trained a generation earlier, and Klimt placed his work publicly at the 1908 Kunstschau. From 1953 he ran the Schule des Sehens (School of Seeing) summer academy in Salzburg for more than twenty years, teaching generations of European and American painters. Lucian Freud and Frank Auerbach cited him.
He refused photography as painting reference, calling a photograph a "dead instant" lacking temporal depth. He refused the posed silent sitter, refused to varnish his early paintings, and refused to subordinate the background to the figure. He also refused a fixed studio location and worked from wherever he lived.
You believe the sitter's interior is what the portrait is actually about, and the exterior likeness is the by-product of getting the interior right. The eyes and the hands are the painting.
Borrow this: For your next portrait, require the sitter to talk through the whole session. Paint standing, all over the canvas simultaneously rather than part to part. Use your fingers for at least one passage.
Educational reference. Artworks remain © their respective rights holders. Removal requests: daniel@methods.art.
%2C%201913.jpg)
