Marie Bashkirtseff worked the rigorous French academic method with ferocious ambition at the Academie Julian in Paris from 1877 until her death in 1884. Because women were barred from the state Ecole des Beaux-Arts, the private Academie was the premier place for professional training. Her process built one highly finished figure from a live model who held a single pose for a full week, eight hours a day. Twice a week she took intense critiques from Salon masters like Tony Robert-Fleury and Jules Lefebvre. The system ran on relentless competition, with weekly rankings and monthly contests. Bashkirtseff documented that whole world, the ambition, the rivalries, the exhaustion, in her famous Journal, which she wrote intending it for publication. Her monumental 1881 painting In the Studio is a primary visual record of this training environment for women artists.
Worked from a single live model pose held all week, Monday to Saturday, eight hours a day, toward one highly finished drawing or painting.
Why it matters · This was the core of the Academie Julian training. Unlike a quick sketch, the week-long pose demanded sustained looking and the ability to carry a figure all the way to a resolved, Salon-grade finish.
Treated the studio as an arena, tracking her rank in the weekly critique and pouring herself into the formal monthly competitions.
Why it matters · For Bashkirtseff art was inseparable from ambition, and the concours, with its rankings and prizes, was the training ground for the Salon. Her journal records the cost: she wrote of sleeping three hours a night during concours week.
Kept a voluminous, candid journal of her training, rivalries, and frustrations, explicitly intending it for publication as the record of a great artist.
Why it matters · The journal is one of the fullest accounts of a 19th-century artist's life, and rarest as a woman's. It turns the private work of learning into a public record of ambition, making her own process a subject in itself.
Undertook the large In the Studio (1881) at the director's request, a group portrait of the women's atelier that doubled as an advertisement for the school.
Why it matters · It was a move on the studio itself: painting the act of painting. It documented the then-unusual environment of the women's atelier and fixed her own place within it, turning her training ground into her subject.
After seeing Velazquez she pursued a realism built on true, ringing colour, writing that she wanted "tones that sing, and all true tones sing."
Why it matters · It shows her reaching past academic drawing toward a painterly aim. Her training was in precise line and form, but her ambition was to catch life with a palette that was both accurate and alive, the central concern of 19th-century realism.
Begin by drawing from plaster casts of antique sculpture (dessin d'apres la bosse) to master form, light, and shadow. Bashkirtseff appears to have moved through this stage quickly.
Why: This was the foundational first step of academic training, meant to settle the principles of classical form before the complexity of the live model.
Arrive early on Monday to take a good vantage on the week's single pose. The winner of the previous week's concours got first choice of place.
Why: Position mattered for a week-long study. A clear view meant a truer drawing and a better chance at a prize-winning result.
Draw or paint from the live model across the week, Monday to Saturday, developing one highly finished work.
Why: The long pose allowed a finish and an accuracy impossible in short studies, mirroring the process behind a formal Salon painting.
Twice a week, pause for the visiting professor's correction. The master (Robert-Fleury or Lefebvre) judged the work and gave individual instruction.
Why: This was the core teaching moment: direct, often severe judgment from a successful Salon artist, the standard against which the week's work was measured.
At the end of the week the work was ranked against the others. Monthly, a more formal concours was held for a medal and, by some accounts, a cash prize.
Why: The whole system was geared to competition. Constant ranking was the mechanism for measuring progress and proving mastery.
Every teacher and student below sits on the site-wide teacher-student map.
“If I do not die young, I hope to live as a great artist; but if I die young, I intend to have my journal, which cannot fail to be interesting, published.”
“Fortunately there is the atelier. With the atelier I fear nothing.”
“Do you think that if I slept more than three hours a night during concours week, I would have placed as I did?”
“I was still and icy with terror... He sat down. I knew only enough French to stammer out, as my defence, that it was my first attempt in Life-Class. He muttered something in a deep voice that sounded like an oath, and plunged me deeper in woe.”
A private art school in Paris, founded in 1868, that became the most important institution for women and foreign students excluded from the state-run Ecole des Beaux-Arts. It offered a rigorous academic curriculum, identical to the men's, centered on drawing and painting from the live model.
She followed the strict academic method: mastering form by drawing from plaster casts, then working from the live model. The core was the week-long study, where she carried a single pose to a highly finished drawing or painting, which was then ranked in a weekly competition.
It is one of the most detailed and candid firsthand accounts of an artist's training in the 19th century. Because she was a woman, it gives a rare perspective on the ambitions and obstacles of female artists in a male-dominated profession. She wrote it intending it to be published.
Her main teachers at the Academie Julian were Tony Robert-Fleury and Jules Joseph Lefebvre, both celebrated academic painters and influential members of the Paris Salon jury. They gave individual critiques twice a week. The director, Rodolphe Julian, acted as her promoter.
The large 1881 painting is a group portrait of her fellow students in the women's atelier at the Academie Julian. It was commissioned by the director, Rodolphe Julian, as an advertisement for the school, and it documents the environment where women could get professional art training.
Her chief rival at the Academie Julian was Louise Catherine Breslau, a gifted Swiss-born painter. Bashkirtseff's journal is full of obsessive, envious comments about Breslau's talent, a measure of how competitive the school was.
You believe skill is forged in competition. You thrive on rigorous, structured training, you value the judgment of established masters, and you will pay in effort and sleep to place first. You document your process, certain the story of the struggle is part of the work.
Borrow this: Commit to one complex figure from life for a full week, Monday to Saturday. At the end, submit it for a public critique against your peers. Keep a brutally honest journal about your ambition, your progress, and your rivals, and treat that record of your process as an artwork in itself.
Educational reference. Artworks remain © their respective rights holders. Removal requests: daniel@methods.art.
