Andrew Loomis

1892–1959 · United States

Researched by Daniel Bilmes, painter and educator.

Andrew Loomis drew by construction first: every head began as a ball with flattened sides carrying the brow, nose, and chin divisions, and every figure began on a head-unit proportional scaffold, both set turning in space before any feature or anatomy was placed. Rendering then obeyed what he called the form principle, one light source and one consistent set of value relationships governing every form in the picture, with values grouped into a few big masses so the tonal statement stayed simple. He taught the system in Chicago and set it down in six Viking Press books written between 1939 and 1961, including Figure Drawing for All It's Worth and Creative Illustration, which stayed in such demand through decades out of print that Titan Books returned them to print from 2011. It is the most widely taught head-and-figure construction method in the world.

ProcessConstructive TemperamentMeasured LineageAmerican

Signature moves

Build the head from a ball and a plane

Started every head as a sphere with flattened sides, hung the brow, nose, and chin thirds off it, and turned the whole construction in space before any feature was drawn.

Why it matters · A feature drawn on a constructed ball sits on a skull; a feature drawn on a flat oval floats. The ball-and-plane head is the reason a Loomis-trained artist can draw a convincing head from any angle without a reference, and it remains the most-taught head method in the world.

Andrew Loomis, Drawing the Head and Hands (Viking), 1956

Render everything under the form principle

Held that a picture convinces when every form is rendered consistently with one light source, one set of value relationships, and one atmosphere, what he called the form principle.

Why it matters · It moves the question from "does this detail look right" to "does this detail obey the same light as everything else." One consistent light is why a Loomis illustration reads as a single moment instead of assembled parts, and it is the idea that connects drawing to painting.

Andrew Loomis, Creative Illustration (Viking), Part 1, the form principle, 1947

Set the figure with head-unit proportions

Measured the standing figure in head lengths, using an idealised eight-head chart as scaffolding, then adjusted for the individual model or character.

Why it matters · A memorised proportional scaffold means the figure starts believable before observation refines it. The chart is a starting grid, not a rule; Loomis is explicit that the ideal figure is a convention you deviate from on purpose.

Andrew Loomis, Figure Drawing for All It's Worth (Viking), 1943

Group values into a few big masses

Reduced every subject to a small number of connected value shapes, keeping the big tonal statement simple and saving small value changes for inside the masses.

Why it matters · Pictures carry across a room on three or four values, not forty. Grouping first is what keeps finish from destroying unity, the same discipline the tonal painters practiced, stated as a teachable rule.

Andrew Loomis, Creative Illustration (Viking), the tonal chapters, 1947

Compose by informal subdivision

Divided the picture rectangle with unequal, informal divisions to place subjects, rather than centring or halving, so the design felt inevitable without reading as geometric.

Why it matters · It is a practical, repeatable answer to "where do I put things," fast enough for deadline work and loose enough to avoid the deadness of symmetrical layouts. Working illustrators still use it because it decides composition in minutes.

Andrew Loomis, Creative Illustration (Viking), the composition chapters, 1947

Studio

Light: A working Chicago illustration studio serving national advertising and magazine clients, organised for deadline production rather than gallery painting.
Position: At the drawing table and easel through a commercial career, and at the front of the classroom at the American Academy of Art in Chicago, where his course notes grew into the books.
Session length: Deadline-driven commercial sessions across a roughly four-decade career; the books distil the teaching he repeated for years of classes.
Tools: Pencil and charcoal for the construction drawing the books teach · Oil and gouache for finished illustration work · The proportional charts and the ball-and-plane armature as standing equipment of the method
Notes: Loomis was a top-tier working illustrator (advertising, magazine fiction, calendars) whose teaching authority came from the work itself. The six books, written 1939 to 1961, went out of print for decades and traded at collector prices until Titan Books began reprinting them in 2011; they have stayed in print since.

Source: Titan Books, reissue editions of the Loomis library (2011 onward)

Palette

Ground: Illustration board and canvas for finished commercial work; the instructional legacy is drawing-first, so the record stays honest about that.
Whites: White gouache and oil white in finished illustration
Earths: Pencil, charcoal, and carbon for the constructive underdrawing
Blacks: Carbon pencil and ink for reproduction line work
Medium: Commercial illustration media of the 1930s-1950s: oil, gouache, carbon pencil. The books teach construction, values, and light rather than a pigment recipe.

Source: Andrew Loomis, Creative Illustration (Viking), the media and reproduction notes, 1947

Workflow, from blank canvas

1. Construct the armature
Ball-and-plane for a head, the head-unit scaffold for a figure: set the big construction turning in space first.
Why: Features and anatomy hung on a true construction read in three dimensions from any angle; drawn without it, they float.
2. Decide the one light
Fix the light source, the direction, and the value key the whole picture will obey, the form principle decision.
Why: Every later rendering question resolves against this one decision. It is what makes a finished picture read as a single moment.
3. Group the values
Mass the subject into a few connected value shapes and check the pattern reads at postage-stamp size.
Why: The big tonal statement carries the picture; detail can only refine what the pattern already says.
4. Compose by subdivision
Place the subject with informal, unequal divisions of the rectangle rather than centring.
Why: Fast, repeatable composition that avoids both randomness and dead symmetry, built for deadline work.
5. Render form, not edges
Model each form consistently with the established light, keeping halftones honest and reserving accents.
Why: Rendering that obeys the form principle stays unified; rendering that chases local detail breaks the light and flattens the work.

Refusals — what they would not do

Refused to let students draw features before the constructed head existed to carry them.
Refused inconsistent lighting: no detail was allowed to contradict the picture's one established light.
Refused the mystery-talent framing of art instruction, insisting drawing is teachable procedure plus observation.
Refused to treat the proportional charts as law, presenting the ideal figure as a convention to deviate from deliberately.

Reference

Primary source: The constructed armature first, observation and photographic reference disciplined onto it, the standard practice of golden-age American illustration.
Photography: Used reference as working illustrators of his era did, subordinated to construction: the books repeatedly warn against copying reference without understanding the form underneath.

Exceptions

The instructional plates are idealised constructions drawn to teach the system.

Lineage

Every teacher and student below sits on the site-wide teacher-student map.

Teachers

George Bridgman · Art Students League, New York, early 1910s — The constructive figure: masses conceived as solids, structure before surface. Loomis's books carry the Bridgman construction forward in friendlier, more procedural form.
Frank Vincent DuMond · Art Students League, New York, early 1910s — Painting instruction in the League tradition alongside the Bridgman drawing training.

Influences

The golden-age American illustration standard: Howard Pyle's picture-making doctrine as transmitted through the illustration field Loomis worked in.

Students

Generations of illustrators and concept artists through the six books, which remain standard first texts in figure construction.
The American Academy of Art students in Chicago he taught directly.

Techniques and practices

loomis-head-construction

ball-and-plane-method

form-principle-lighting

proportional-head-unit-figure

informal-subdivision-composition

value-grouping

Questions and answers

What is the Loomis method?

A construction-first way of drawing. Heads start as a ball with flattened sides carrying the feature divisions; figures start on a head-unit proportional scaffold; both are set in perspective before detail. Rendering then follows the form principle: one light source and consistent values unifying every form in the picture.

What is the Loomis head?

A sphere with the sides flattened into planes, split by a centre line, with the brow, nose, and chin thirds hung from it. Because it is a solid construction rather than a flat oval, it can be turned to any angle and the features stay attached to the skull. It is taught today in almost every figure-drawing curriculum.

What is the form principle?

Loomis's name, in Creative Illustration (1947), for the doctrine that a picture convinces when everything in it is rendered under one light: one source, one direction, one value logic, one atmosphere. Any detail that contradicts the established light breaks the picture's unity, however well drawn it is.

Which Andrew Loomis book should I start with?

For pure figure construction, Figure Drawing for All It's Worth (1943). For picture-making, values, and composition, Creative Illustration (1947) is the central text. Fun With a Pencil (1939) is the gentlest entry. All are in print again through Titan Books.

Who taught Andrew Loomis?

He trained at the Art Students League of New York in the early 1910s, studying under George Bridgman, whose constructive-anatomy system underlies the Loomis approach, and Frank Vincent DuMond. Loomis turned the Bridgman construction into the friendlier procedural books that carried it worldwide.

Why were Loomis books so expensive before the reprints?

The six Viking titles went out of print after his death in 1959, and demand from illustrators and animators never stopped, so used copies traded for hundreds of dollars. Titan Books began reissuing the library in 2011, and the books have stayed in print since.

If this painter is your match

You want procedure you can trust under pressure: a head that constructs the same way every time, values grouped before rendering, one light everything obeys. You treat charts and formulas as scaffolding for observation, not a substitute for it.

Borrow this: Before rendering anything, answer Loomis's two questions: what is the construction (ball-and-plane, head units), and what is the one light every form must obey? Then group the whole subject into four values or fewer and keep the big pattern readable at thumbnail size.

Adjacent painters

Louise Bourgeois1911–2010

A French-American sculptor who returned compulsively to drawing and painting through six decades of nightly insomnia, treated the daily mark as self-administered psychoanalysis, and built a private cosmology of red, spirals, spiders, and houses.

George Bridgman1864–1943

The Art Students League drawing teacher who built the figure from blocky masses set in perspective, fixed the structure and the movement before any surface detail, and trained a generation of American illustrators.

Pieter Bruegel the Elder1525–1569

A Flemish master who sketched the Alps on horseback in 1552 and for the rest of his life composed his panel paintings in the studio from a library of those drawings, a set of peasant-wedding field notes, and a habit of "moralizing" every scene through absurdist humor.

Charles Bargue1826–1883

The French draughtsman whose plate course with Gerome, exact outlines and big shadow shapes copied in strict progression, became the standard atelier curriculum and trained eyes from Van Gogh to today.

Primary sources

Andrew Loomis, Fun With a Pencil (Viking), 1939. The first book: the ball-and-plane head introduced through the "Blook" constructions.
Andrew Loomis, Figure Drawing for All It's Worth (Viking), 1943. The figure text: head-unit proportions, the standing figure, structure to finish. The most-cited Loomis title.
Andrew Loomis, Creative Illustration (Viking), 1947. The professional text: the form principle, tonal grouping, informal subdivision, line-tone-color. Widely considered his central book.
Andrew Loomis, Successful Drawing (Viking), 1951. Perspective and construction for the working artist.
Andrew Loomis, Drawing the Head and Hands (Viking), 1956. The mature head-construction text; with Figure Drawing, the standard reference pair.
Titan Books reissues of the Loomis library, 2011. Evidence of sustained demand: the reprint program that ended decades of out-of-print scarcity, championed publicly by illustrators including Alex Ross.

See how every master in the atlas worked, indexed by method →